Posted in August 5, 2010 ¬ 22:09h.Ronald Landheer-Cieslak
A few days ago, I explained to a colleague why certain communications protocols have a “tell me twice” policy – i.e. to allow for any command to have any effect, the same command – or a command to the same effect – has to be received twice (from the same master). In human parlance, this [...]
Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in June 16, 2010 ¬ 23:42h.Ronald Landheer-Cieslak
In this installment, we’ll be doing a final bit of clean-up and starting to implement a GSS-API/SSPI client program, while focusing on the Abstract Factory Pattern
Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in June 4, 2010 ¬ 18:54h.Ronald Landheer-Cieslak
While going through some old code, for another article I’m writing that will come up on the blog, I came across an implementation of binary search in C. While the implementation itself was certainly OK, it wasn’t exactly a general-purpose implementation, so I thought I’d write one and put it on the C++ for the [...]
Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in February 1, 2010 ¬ 13:00h.Ronald Landheer-Cieslak
In the “C++ for the self-taught” series, we’re about to embark on a new project. In order to describe that project and in order to figure out what we want the result of that project will be, we will be using a tool called the use-case. So, I think an intermezzo on use-cases is in [...]
Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in January 16, 2010 ¬ 23:58h.Ronald Landheer-Cieslak
Bits of Evidence View more presentations from Greg Wilson.
Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in January 16, 2010 ¬ 00:42h.Ronald Landheer-Cieslak
One of the things I do as a analyst-programmer is write software – that would be the “programmer” part. I usually do that in C++ but, sometimes, when the facilities of C++ aren’t available (e.g. no exception handling and no RTTI) C becomes a more obvious choice. When that happens, RTTI is not the thing [...]
Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in November 17, 2009 ¬ 16:59h.Ronald Landheer-Cieslak
We tend to forget what we know implicitly: if we’ve been working in the same domain for long enough, we tend to forget that not everybody knows the same things and has the same experience we do. For example, some-one who has been working in distribution for a long time may think it’s obvious that, [...]
Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in November 10, 2009 ¬ 22:00h.Ronald Landheer-Cieslak
In recent literature from the scientific side of software engineering, there’ve been a lot of publications on producing and maintaining high-quality software. A lot of focus is being put on tools, systems, procedures and processes that aim to reduce the price-tag of quality and avoid the price-tag of failure.
Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in October 26, 2009 ¬ 11:22h.Ronald Landheer-Cieslak
There is probably nothing worse than badly defined semantics: functions that might (or might not) take ownership of the object you pass to them can be a serious maintenance headache.
Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in September 30, 2009 ¬ 14:19h.Ronald Landheer-Cieslak
Yesterday, I was asked what I saw as the most important factors to ensure the development of quality software. What I cited was good design, good implementation following good standards, and good testing. On the testing end, I have a rule-of-thumb that says that at least 85% of the code should be covered with unit [...]
Read the rest of this entry »